October 17, 2022<\/p>\n
Certain improvements to the protection system resulted from the adoption of the General Mandatory Instructions for Procedures of the Prosecution Service, with which 34 criminal acts that can be committed to the detriment of journalists have been encompassed. These instructions led to swifter responses from the prosecution immediately after the lodging of criminal complaints, and this is the impression of both journalists\u2019 associations and the journalists who have faced attacks. However, the number of criminal charges that are rejected remains high, journalists continuously suffer the consequences of attacks that are not punishable under the law, experiencing secondary victimisation through the protection system itself, while journalists highlight the lack of information they receive about the development of proceedings as an important shortcoming in the approach of the prosecution.<\/p>\n
The respondent journalists generally think that the main features of solving attacks against journalists are selectivity and dependence on political pressure, while there are rules determining which cases the authorities will solve. All interviewed journalists consider that the authorities lack awareness regarding attacks against journalists, and they most often describe their work using the words \u201cignorance\u201d and \u201chypocrisy\u201d.<\/p>\n